Temporary Injuction or stay order case laws

-
"Temporary Injunction"  -  Few important judgments of the Supreme Court of India.


1. Rathnavathi v. Kavita Ganashamdas, (2015) 5 SCC 2232. Ram Prakash Agarwal v. Gopi Krishan, (2013) 11 SCC 2963. Lakshmi v. E. Jayaram, (2013) 9 SCC 3114. Best Sellers Retail (India) (P) Ltd. v. Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., (2012) 6 SCC 7925. Esha Ekta Appartments CHS Ltd. v. Municipal Corpn. of Mumbai, (2012) 4 SCC 6896. Ranjit Kaur v. Major Harmohinder Singh, (2011) 15 SCC 95 : (2014) 2 SCC7. Supreme Court Bar Assn. v. B.D. Kaushik, (2011) 13 SCC 7748. Skyline Education Institute (India) (P) Ltd. v. S.L. Vaswani, (2010) 2 SCC 1429. Home Care Retail Marts (P) Ltd. v. New Era Fabrics Ltd., (2009) 17 SCC 42910. Zenit Mataplast (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra, (2009) 10 SCC 38811. Mandali Ranganna v. T. Ramachandra, (2008) 11 SCC 112. D. Dwarakanath Reddy v. Chaitanya Bharathi Educational Society, (2007) 6 SCC 13013. M. Gurudas v. Rasaranjan, (2006) 8 SCC 36714. Seema Arshad Zaheer v. Municipal Corpn. of Greater Mumbai, (2006) 5 SCC 28215. Rajasthan Housing Board v. Krishna Kumari, (2005) 13 SCC 15116. Fargo Freight Ltd. v. Commodities Exchange Corpn., (2004) 7 SCC 20317. State of Haryana v. State of Punjab, (2004) 12 SCC 67318. Vareed Jacob v. Sosamma Geevarghese, (2004) 6 SCC 378,19. Hardesh Ores (P) Ltd. v. Timblo Minerals (P) Ltd., (2004) 4 SCC 6420. Haridas Exports v. All India Float Glass Manufacturers’ Assn., (2002) 6 SCC 60021. Mahendra & Mahendra Paper Mills Ltd. v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., (2002) 2 SCC 14722. Anand Prasad Agarwalla v. Tarkeshwar Prasad, (2001) 5 SCC 56823. Uniply Industries Ltd. v. Unicorn Plywood (P) Ltd., (2001) 5 SCC 9524. A. Venkatasubbiah Naidu v. S. Chellappan, (2000) 7 SCC 69525. S.M. Dyechem Ltd. v. Cadbury (India) Ltd., (2000) 5 SCC 57326. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Ltd., (1999) 7 SCC 127. Sree Jain Swetambar Terapanthi Vid (S) v. Phundan Singh, (1999) 2 SCC 37728. Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar of Trade Marks, (1998) 8 SCC 129. N.R. Dongre v. Whirlpool Corpn., (1996) 5 SCC 71430. Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Coca Cola Co., (1995) 5 SCC 54531. Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke v. Pune Municipal Corpn.(1995) 3 SCC 3332. Shiv Kumar Chadha v. Municipal Corpn. of Delhi, (1993) 3 SCC 16133. Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh, (1992) 1 SCC 71934. Cotton Corpn. of India Ltd. v. United Industrial Bank Ltd., (1983) 4 SCC 625

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Consumer Dispute resolution under the Telecom Act 2023

-
Image
The Telecommunications Act of 2023 has strengthened the dispute resolution framework by introducing an online grievance redressal system. The aim is to expedite the resolution of conflicts between telecommunications companies and consumers while ensuring transparency in the redressal process. Following an inquiry, a telecom company found violating license or service terms may incur severe penalties, spectrum holdings cancellation, service restrictions, or even be prohibited from providing telecom services, depending on the seriousness of the breach.  How does the online grievance redressal system operate, and who plays key roles?   An Adjudicating Officer (AO), appointed by the Centre and not below the rank of joint secretary, will conduct inquiries to resolve disputes between telecom service providers and consumers. Additionally, a separate Designated Appeals Committee (DAC) will be formed, consisting of officers at the rank of additional secretaries. Individuals dissatisfie...
Read more

Types of Cyber Attacks

-
Image
Types of Cyber Attacks There are several effective methods for disrupting computer systems. We are talking of a method known as cyber attack, or computer network attack , which uses malicious computer code to disrupt computer processing, or steal data.  A brief description of three different methods are shown here. However, as technology changes, future distinctions between these methods may begin to blur. An attack against computers may be targeted or un-targeted (i) disrupt equipment and hardware reliability, (ii) change processing logic, or (iii) steal or corrupt data. The methods discussed here are chosen based on the technology asset against which each attack mode is directed, and the effects each method can produce. The assets affected or effects produced can sometimes overlap for different attack methods.  Conventional kinetic weapons can be directed against computer equipment, a computer facility, or transmission lines to create a physical attack that ...
Read more

What to do when police does not take your FIR?

-
Image
What to do when FIR is not taken by the Police ? A First Information Report is the first legal document that initiates criminal proceedings. The first information received about the commission of a cognizable offense has to be noted down by a Police Officer. It is called as  First Information Report under Section 154 of CRPC. Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offences: Cognizable offences  are offences where the police can arrest the accused without any warrant. In such offences, the police can Suo-moto take cognizance of the offence and it does not require any sanction from the court in order to begin the investigation. On the other hand,  Non-Cognizable  offences are those in which police cannot make an arrest without taking prior assent from the court. Schedule I of the Criminal Procedure Code clearly distinguishes which offenses are cognizable and which are not. According to section 154(1) of the Criminal Procedural Code,  an FIR can be filed only in cognizable ...
Read more