Showing posts with label cybersecurity policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cybersecurity policy. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 12, 2020

Strategic Cybersecurity Thinking














Strategic Cybersecurity Thinking

The ability to come up with effective plans in line with an organization's objectives within a particular cybersecurity situation. Strategic thinking helps cybersecurity managers review policy issues, perform long term planning, set goals and determine priorities, and identify potential risks and opportunities.

Clearly, there needs to be a clear strategy as to what needs to be done with respect to security. Such a strategy should determine the policies and procedures. However in practice rarely a strategy for security is created. Most emphasis is placed on policies, implementation of which is generally relegated to the lowest levels. Rather it is assumed that most people will follow the policy that is created. 

A strategic cybersecurity programme does not begin with tools and tactics, but with an articulation of one or more programme goals. Sun Tzu once said in The Art of War: “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.” Essentially this means that before you start with strategic planning you have to know what you are and what you are not because the way you operate can either make or break a successful execution. First, the strategy-minded CISO gets executive buy-in to those goals. To that end, the CISO must incorporate all levels of strategic thought, starting with the board and CEO – everyone must feel ownership and participation. 

The smart CISO recognises that security is a journey, not a destination, and that relationship building requires an ability to translate between technical and non-technical vocabularies. The CISO ensures that the programme goals accurately govern the objectives of the enterprise’s digital security programme. In our scenario, the CISO, board, and CEO all agree that, with respect to intellectual property, trade secrets, and sensitive data, the new policy goal is to minimise loss due to intrusion. 

This statement implies that everyone understands that stopping all adversaries and all attacks is simply not possible, especially when dealing with nation-state actors and some advanced criminal groups. The primary objective of this exercise is to achieve consensus on a simply stated, non-technical programme goal. No in-depth technical discussion is needed to achieve consensus, although the CISO must ensure that all goals, policies, and strategies are technically feasible. With a mandate in hand, the CISO can confidently work with his or her security team to plan the necessary operations and campaigns and, if necessary, acquire new tools and tactics to facilitate them. Together, they decide to implement a network security monitoring (NSM) operation, defined as the collection and escalation of indications and warnings to detect and respond to intruders. 

The security team begins the long-term, strategic process of hunting for hostile cyberattack campaigns, encompassing both known and unknown intrusion patterns. The CISO, board, and CEO all agree that a second programme goal is a rapid detection, response, and containment of cyber threats. This goal helps to ensure that when intruders breach the perimeter defences, the game is far from over. 

Defenders can still win, so long as they contain the threat before the attacker can accomplish his or her ultimate mission. Therefore, the security team will develop strategies to identify compromises quickly, determine their nature, give them some level of attribution, and above all develop a plan to stop the attacker from accomplishing his or her mission. At the tactical level of individual engagements with the adversary – the equivalent of battles in war – the security team will have myriad decisions to make, including whether to dislodge the intruder immediately or whether to watch the intruder for a time in order to collect valuable intelligence.

Some tactics govern how specific tools or techniques can be used, such as when Star Trek personnel switch their hand phasers between ‘stun’ and ‘kill’. As always, the adversary gets a say in what happens, but from the enterprise’s point of view, programme goals, policies, and guidelines should be written to govern this entire process.

Thursday, December 11, 2014

Cyber Security: Build a Culture of Prevention in Your Organisation


Cyber Security:  Build a Culture of Prevention in Your Organisation
Prashant Mali, 
Cyber Security Policy & Law Expert - India

“You cannot buy the revolution. You cannot make the revolution. You can only be the revolution. It is in your spirit, or it is nowhere.” 
― 
Ursula K. Le GuinThe Dispossessed

Today all organization’s need “Cyber Security Revolution”  i.e they need to bring in culture of cyber security within their organization. A strong cyber security culture is both a mindset and mode of operation. One that’s integrated into day-to-day thinking and decision-making can make for a near-impenetrable operation. Conversely, a security culture that’s absent will facilitate uncertainty and, ultimately, lead to security incidents that you likely can’t afford to take on. This is also brings us to have Cyber Insurance as part of the organisations culture.

What is a organizations cyber security culture?
An organisation's cyber security culture is the styles, approaches and values that it wishes to adopt towards cyber security.

The lack of robust security protocols and standards for data exchange between enterprise systems, devices and personal/home devices can put organizations at increased risk and exposure. However, by employing a comprehensive threat intelligence strategy, organizations can more effectively, proactively and sustainably defend against threat adversaries. The development of policies, procedures and training can further prevent attacks and raise user awareness to be mindful of clicking links, executing files or sharing account information. “When building cyber security capabilities, a Chief Security Officer must be able to identify data in an organizational environment, know the systems, devices and networks on which they are located, and build a security profile around them that addresses potential vulnerabilities,”
A strong cyber defense strategy should address how to prepare and monitor attacks, respond and ultimately recover from breaches. At a minimum, security architecture should be able to stall adversarial efforts, thwart attacks at each phase and facilitate a rapid response. Today, there are several cyber security frameworks that organizations may use as guidelines - such as ISO, COBIT and NIST - to develop security architecture. By overlaying these with counter-responses to the tactics, techniques and procedures that a threat adversary may employ, CISO’s can develop a robust defensive infrastructure. 
Many of these defensive strategies can be broadly characterised into the following three classifications:
1. Mitigate threats before they enter a network by having the basic controls in place -such as ensuring that operating systems and anti-malware, web filtering and antivirus software on servers and endpoints are updated and patched to reduce the risk of vulnerabilities and infections. At a primary level, preventive measures can be employed by implementing layers of firewall technology to stop known attacks. At a secondary level, the potential damage of a breach can be mitigated through automated alerts and notifications that quickly activate appropriate response measures according to security protocols. By training employees and building a culture of cyber security from top management to workers on ground, many breaches can be prevented upstream through user awareness of potentially malicious links, emails, websites, advertisements and files. As Kevin Mitnick notes in his book, The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of Security, these technological methods of protecting information may be effective in their respective ways; however, many losses are not caused by a lack of technology or faulty technology but rather by users of technology and faulty human behavior. It stands to reason then that people not only can be part of the problem, but also they can and should be part of the solution.
2. Discover threats that have entered or tried to enter systems. No organization can prevent every cyberattack, but it is important to build a response system that can alert your security staff, rapidly identify a breach and its scope, and notify other enforcement points so that a breach can be contained without extensive collateral damage. Depending on the adversary, an organization may be better served by disrupting and throttling an attack rather than responding with a knee-jerk reaction that tips off an adversary to engage in additional attacks.
3. Respond to any threats that have breached the network. In addition to deploying sandbox appliances which can test and detect novel threats, it may be recommended for some organizations to deploy internal network firewalls and mitigate an attack once a network has already been breached. Depending on the extent to which data is stored on internal or external servers, organizations may need to develop coordinated responses to a breach with other entities.
The risk of cyber attacks is no longer limited to the IT desk, it is a key business issue that must be addressed by the Board. No organization can be completely immune from cyber attacks and adversaries. However, they can take appropriate measures to erect defenses and integrate cyber security into the business environment and culture. Management buy-in, establishing policies and updating them regularly, identifying and communicating the security awareness goals and message clearly and often, and performing assessments are crucial to a successful cyber security awareness program. By implementing some of these changes, organizations can achieve higher levels of cyber security awareness maturity and benefit from a stronger cyber security culture. 




FIR : All you want to know about in a criminal case

FIR - What is?  The first information report is a report giving information of the commission of a cognizable crime,  which may be made by t...