WhatsApp group admin Liability Case Law


Case Laws for WhatsApp Group Admin Liability

A vicarious criminal liability can be fastened only by reason of a provision of a statute and not otherwise. In the absence of a special penal law creating vicarious liability, an Admin of a WhatsApp group cannot be held liable for the objectionable post by a group member."

a crime was registered against the first accused under Sections 67B (a),(b) and (d) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 13, 14 and 15 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act.

Manual v. State of Kerala [2022]
CRL MC No.3654 of 2021

WhatsApp group admin can’t be held liable for member’s post unless common intention shown held by Bombay High Court :
Alleged Crime was under Section 67 of the IT Act, 2000 (related to obscenity)

Kishor v State of Maharashtra [2021] GCtR 787 (Nagpur, Bombay HC)
01/03/2021 in Criminal Application (APL) 573/2016

"Common intention cannot be established in a case of WhatsApp service user merely acting as a group administrator. When a person creates a WhatsApp group, he cannot be expected to presume or to have advance knowledge of the criminal acts of the member of the group",

MADRAS High Court Another Judgement 

If the petitioner had played the role of a group administrator alone and nothing else, then while filing final report, the petitioner's name shall be deleted. If some other material is also gathered by the first respondent so as to implicate the petitioner, then of course the petitioner will have to challenge the case only on merits."

R. Rajendran v. The Inspector of Police & Kathirvel

Case No: Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8010 of 2021 & CRL.M.P.(MD)No.4123 of 2021


Adv (Dr.) Prashant Mali
Cyber Law Expert and Author , Lawyer Bombay High Court
Mobile: 9821763157

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Consumer Dispute resolution under the Telecom Act 2023

Types of Cyber Attacks

What to do when police does not take your FIR?