Old headless CAT Going TDSAT Coming, The IT Act, 2000 is amended

-

Old headless CAT Going TDSAT Coming, The IT Act, 2000 is amended
By Advocate Prashant Mali, Cyber Law Expert

The government’s in response to a February 2015 report of a parliamentary standing committee that noted the absence of uniformity in the conditions of service of tribunals.  Government planned a large-scale reshuffle of tribunals, the government sought to reduce the number of these tribunals and bring parity in the service conditions of their officials.
CAT (Cyber Appellate Tribunal) From 2011, has barely been functioning. It still pays out salaries to its employees but no judicial order has been passed nor has any case been heard for the last five years. A CAG audit had noted that after the retirement of the CAT’s last chairperson in June 2011, there has been no replacement appointed as of June 2016. However, members  and other staff continued to render services in the CAT since then and expenditure of Rs. 27.64 crore were incurred on its establishment for the period from 2011-12 to 2015-16 without carrying out its primary business of hearing and disposal of appeals. After a huge big GAP the matters now are transferred to National Lok Adalat on 8th April 2017 from the Cyber Appeallate Tribunal.
The IT Act, 2000 is getting amended by The Finance Bill 2017, following are the changes

 A new clause (da) is added under Section 2, in sub-section(1) (da) “Appellate Tribunal” means the appellate tribunal referred to in sub-section(1) of section 48
2.  The definition of “Cyber Appellate Tribunal” clause(n) under Section 2, in sub-section(1) is omitted
In section 48 of The Information Technology Act,2000
(i)            For the marginal heading, the following marginal heading shall be substituted, namely:-
“Appellate Tribunal”;
(ii)          For sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:-
“(1) The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal established under section 14 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 shall, on and from the commencement of Part XI of Chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2017, be the Appellate Tribunal for the purposes of this Act and the said Appellate Tribunal shall exercise the jurisdiction, powers and authority conferred on it by or under this Act.”
(iii)         In sub-section (2), for the words, brackets and figure “shall also specify, in the notification referred io in sub-section (1)”, the words “shall specify, by notification” shall be substituted;
(d)      Sections 49, 50, 21, 52, 51A, 52B, 52C, 53, 54 and 56 shall be omitted.
(e)      for section 82, the following section shall be substituted, namely:-
“82.    The controller, the Deputy Controller and the Assistant Controllers shall be deemed to be public servants within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code”;
(f)        in section 84, for the words “the Chairperson, Members, adjudicating officers and the staff of the  Cyber Appellate Tribunal”, the words “and adjudicating officers” shall be substituted;
(g)      in section 87, in sub-section (2), clauses (r), (s) and (t) shall be omitted;

Four important changes in Finance Bill 2017 with regards to Tribunals are:
1.    The Competition Appellate Tribunal will now be merged with the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
2.    The Cyber Appellate Tribunal and the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal will be merged with the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal.
3.    The Industrial Tribunal is to also perform the functions of the Employees’ Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal.
4.    The Copyright Board will be merged with the Intellectual Property Appellate Board.

 My Comments & Suggestions for TDSAT:
I welcome the move as the dud “Cyber Appellate Tribunal” never worked and was a black spot on cyber related litigation's. I suggest changes would be
A.   Having a Cyber expert as a full time member in the tribunal or atleast as amicus curae.
B.   Having a fixed date for the bench to sit
C.   Having the bench of TDSAT sitting in cities like Mumbai, Bangalore, Hyderabad e.t.c
D.   TDSAT should use the same online platform which Cyber Appellate Tribunal was using for filing of online appeals with documents.
E.   TDSAT should do some extra work to be a vigilante on all the state Adjudication officers, which are as of date in deep lumbar state.
F.    TDSAT should lead the training and awareness initiative in the cyber area across the country.
G. There should be clarity of appeals which lie from the TDSAT, whether to a High Court or directly Supreme Court

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Consumer Dispute resolution under the Telecom Act 2023

-
Image
The Telecommunications Act of 2023 has strengthened the dispute resolution framework by introducing an online grievance redressal system. The aim is to expedite the resolution of conflicts between telecommunications companies and consumers while ensuring transparency in the redressal process. Following an inquiry, a telecom company found violating license or service terms may incur severe penalties, spectrum holdings cancellation, service restrictions, or even be prohibited from providing telecom services, depending on the seriousness of the breach.  How does the online grievance redressal system operate, and who plays key roles?   An Adjudicating Officer (AO), appointed by the Centre and not below the rank of joint secretary, will conduct inquiries to resolve disputes between telecom service providers and consumers. Additionally, a separate Designated Appeals Committee (DAC) will be formed, consisting of officers at the rank of additional secretaries. Individuals dissatisfie...
Read more

Types of Cyber Attacks

-
Image
Types of Cyber Attacks There are several effective methods for disrupting computer systems. We are talking of a method known as cyber attack, or computer network attack , which uses malicious computer code to disrupt computer processing, or steal data.  A brief description of three different methods are shown here. However, as technology changes, future distinctions between these methods may begin to blur. An attack against computers may be targeted or un-targeted (i) disrupt equipment and hardware reliability, (ii) change processing logic, or (iii) steal or corrupt data. The methods discussed here are chosen based on the technology asset against which each attack mode is directed, and the effects each method can produce. The assets affected or effects produced can sometimes overlap for different attack methods.  Conventional kinetic weapons can be directed against computer equipment, a computer facility, or transmission lines to create a physical attack that ...
Read more

What to do when police does not take your FIR?

-
Image
What to do when FIR is not taken by the Police ? A First Information Report is the first legal document that initiates criminal proceedings. The first information received about the commission of a cognizable offense has to be noted down by a Police Officer. It is called as  First Information Report under Section 154 of CRPC. Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offences: Cognizable offences  are offences where the police can arrest the accused without any warrant. In such offences, the police can Suo-moto take cognizance of the offence and it does not require any sanction from the court in order to begin the investigation. On the other hand,  Non-Cognizable  offences are those in which police cannot make an arrest without taking prior assent from the court. Schedule I of the Criminal Procedure Code clearly distinguishes which offenses are cognizable and which are not. According to section 154(1) of the Criminal Procedural Code,  an FIR can be filed only in cognizable ...
Read more