What is Sensitive Personal Data or Information in India ?
What is
Sensitive Personal Data or Information in India ?
[ DATA
PROTECTION LAWS IN INDIA ]
Sensitive
Personal Data or Information though not directly defined in The Section 2 of
The IT Act, 2000. But the definition which has force of law is
defined under the section 3 of THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (REASONABLE SECURITY
PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES AND SENSITIVE PERSONAL DATA OR INFORMATION) RULES,
2011 made by Central Government In exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (ob) of subsection (2) of section 87 read with section 43A of the
Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000). Section 3 reads as
3. Sensitive personal data or
information.—
Sensitive personal data or information of a person
means such personal information which consists of
information relating to;―
(i) password;
(ii) financial
information such as Bank account or credit card or debit card or other
payment instrument details ;
(iii) physical,
physiological and mental health condition;
(iv) sexual
orientation;
(v) medical records
and history;
(vi) Biometric
information
(vii) any
detail relating to the above clauses as provided to body corporate for
providing service; and
(viii) any of
the information received under above clauses by body corporate for processing,
stored or processed under lawful contract or otherwise:
provided that,
any information that is freely available or accessible in public domain or
furnished under the Right to Information Act, 2005 or any other law
for the time being in force shall not be regarded as sensitive
personal data or information for the purposes of these rules.
To enlarge
this definition further
Definition’s of
1.
Data
2.
Information
3.
Personal
Information
4.
Body
corporate
Have to be
added to the definition of “Sensitive Personal Data or Information” as
legislature have defined them separately.
Section
2(1)(o) of The IT ACT,2000 Defines "Data" means
a representation of information, knowledge, facts, concepts or instructions
which are being prepared or have been prepared in a formalised manner, and is
intended to be processed, is being processed or has been processed in a
computer system or computer network, and may be in any form (including computer
printouts magnetic or optical storage media, punched cards, punched tapes) or
stored internally in the memory of the computer;
Section
2(1)(v) of The IT ACT,2000 Defines "Information" as
"Information" includes data, message, text, images, sound,
voice, codes, computer programs, software and databases or micro film or
computer generated micro fiche;
Section 2(1)(i) defines Personal Information
as “Personal Information” means any information that relates to
a natural person, which, either directly or indirectly, in combination with
other information available or likely to be available with a body corporate, is capable of
identifying such person.
"Body Corporate" is
defined under Explanation (i) of The Section 43-A of The IT Act, 2000
as "Body corporate" means any company and includes a firm, sole
proprietorship or other association of individuals engaged in
commercial or professional activities;
So the full length
definition of Sensitive Personal Data or Information would
be
Sensitive personal
data or information of a person means any information
that relates to a natural person, which, either directly or
indirectly, in combination with other information available or
likely to be available with any company and includes a firm, sole
proprietorship or other association of individuals engaged in
commercial or professional activities, is capable
of identifying such person which
consists of data, message, text, images, sound, voice, codes,
computer programs, software and databases or micro film or computer generated
micro fiche relating to;―
(i) password;
(ii) financial information such as Bank account or credit card
or debit card or other payment instrument details ;
(iii) physical, physiological and mental health condition;
(iv) sexual orientation;
(v) medical
records and history;
(vi) Biometric
Information
(vii) any
detail relating to the above clauses as provided to body corporate for
providing service; and
(viii) any of
the information received under above clauses by body corporate for
processing, stored or processed under lawful contract or
otherwise:
provided that,
any information that is freely available or accessible in public domain or
furnished under the Right to Information Act, 2005 or any other law for the time
being in force shall not be regarded as
sensitive personal
data or information for the purposes of these rules.
Also, reading carefully clause (viii) above the further
intention of legislature could also be found out that Information any
information that is NOT freely available or accessible in
public domain or furnished under the Right to Information Act,
2005 or any other law for the time being in force shall be regarded
as sensitive personal data or information for the purposes of these
rules.
even though presence
of the word shall gives it a directive meaning.
So the questions
could be :
if someone lays hand on my mobile phone CDR(Call Data Record) illegally and finds
out whether i am calling which Specialist Doctor or psychiatrist or Specialist Lab like Thyrocare e.t.c
does it reveal my medical record or history or Mental health
condition or it gives certain conclusion to the person who has illegally
procured my CDR.
I feel Yes !!
If i am
calling my banker or my stock broker or private equity guy or any lender or
investor isn't the CDR revealing it all my financial details.
I feel Yes !!
CDR (call data record) thus falls under
definition of Sensitive Personal Data or Information under the IT Act, 2000
Other
Examples of Sensitive Personal Data would be:
1. Pathology
Lab Reports.
2. Sex
determination test.
3. Height or Weight of the person
4. Bank
Statement.
5. Credit
card /Debit card Statements.
6. Cheque or Demand Draft or Pay order or echeque details
7. PIN Number
8. DIN Number
9. Secret Question to reveal password
10. Electronic keys e.t.c
The Supreme Court of India has interpreted
the right to life to mean right to dignified life in Kharak Singh case especially
the minority judgment of Subba Rao, J. In Gobind
v. State of M.P, Mathew J.,
delivering the majority judgment asserted
that the right to privacy was itself a fundamental right, but subject to some restrictions
on the basis of compelling public interest. Privacy as such interpreted by our
Apex Court in its various judgments means different things to different people.
Privacy is a desire to be left alone, the desire to be paid for
ones data and ability to act freely.
Right to privacy
relating to a person’s correspondence has become a debating issue due to the
technological developments. In R.M.
Malkani v. State of Maharashtra, the Supreme Court observed that, the Court
will not tolerate safeguards for the protection of the citizen to be imperilled
by permitting the police to proceed by unlawful or irregular methods. Telephone
tapping is an invasion of right to privacy and freedom of speech and expression
and also Government cannot impose prior restraint on publication of defamatory
materials against its officials and if it does so, it would be violative of
Article 21 and Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. In Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India the Supreme
Court held that right to hold a telephonic conversation in the privacy of one’s
home or office without interference can certainly be claimed as right to
privacy. In this case the Supreme Court had laid down certain procedural
guidelines to conduct legal interceptions, and also provided for a high-level review
committee to investigate the relevance for such interceptions.
Conclusion :
So if Body Corporate Do not follow reasonable security practices
to safe guard Sensitive Personal Data or Information of all the data they possess
have to pay severe compensation to the entity/ person whose data so gets
compromised.
Sensitive Personal Data or Information though defined in the IT
Rules of 2011under The IT Act, cannot be construed strictly as it is said law
lies in its interpretation and history has shown interpretation differs in
different times .The definition cannot be strictly construed for two reasons.
One because the definition encompasses various words which are defined separately
and cognizance have to be taken to arrive at intentions of the legislature and
society at large and Second because what can be sensitive to one person at one
time cannot be sensitive to other person at different timings. As today if we
get Call Data Records of Harshad Mehta or Nathuram Ghodse even though the data
so obtained would remain personal but not sensitive coz of time has passed by
and so is relevance.
Tour related data like someone going on a travel, say even a medical tourism for a surgery to a different city or a foreign country. I book a ticket through a travel agent on a religious trip. The travel agent posts in his Facebook or in his website (in his show room physically) details of all those who are taking part in the tour. Does it amount to a breach of sensitive data? Yes, only if it relates to medical tourism and not otherwise? V Rajendran
ReplyDelete